6 of the Best/Worst Rebrands of All Time

6 of the Best/Worst Rebrands of All Time

The visuals that comprise a company’s branding carry a bodyweight over and above words. Very good branding can express trustworthiness, goodwill, nostalgia – any range of constructive ideas and psychological responses. Bad branding, on the other hand, can make a great firm search incompetent, dated, or out-of-contact. Typography, colour, form, texture and area all function with each other, for great or negative, to establish this crucial component of brand name messaging. 

Nevertheless there is no proven scientific components that defines what “good” or “bad” are in branding, we do have the collective profit of documentation outlining certain stunning wins and fails in branding. From these cases, we can glean a increased understanding of what functions – and what doesn’t. Without having even more ado:

THE Very good:

Pizza Hut

6 of the Best/Worst Rebrands of All Time

In no way underestimate the power of nostalgia. In the 1980s and 1990s, Pizza Hut was the epitome of interesting. They had the private pan pizzas. They experienced the Book-It. They had the freaking Ninja Turtles. And they had stellar branding and a super-cool brand that was originally designed in the 1960s. That emblem went by the wayside all through a rebrand in 1999, and the company’s subsequent string of replacement logos, along with the restaurant’s acceptance, were being achieved with declining fascination.

A short while ago, and possibly largely thanks to Stranger Factors, Pizza Hut resurrected its classic logo (with insignificant alterations), and actually, no just one is complaining. The pink roof is not a alternative, per se, but is remaining used in tandem with the 2014 circle logo as of late 2019. 



Instagram rebrand before and after

The snippy-snappy picture application was in the beginning well known between those who longed for the previous (and a way to get absent from their dad and mom on Facebook), capitalizing on innovative filters that emulated fuzzy analog movie. Remaining launched only on iOS at the peak of the skeuomorphism app icon section, Instagram’s emblem featured an old university camera (for the reason that what else would you get pics with on your extravagant $800 alarm clock?).

In 2016, as they started to introduce new features to the app, they swapped more than to a much additional minimum icon that felt futuristic and hip at the same time. To begin with, a ton of men and women hated the big adjustment, but we really feel it has stood the test of time. The manufacturer is now adaptable and ready to increase with the firm as opposed to getting locked into 2010.


Chobani rebrand before and after

Jordan and Pippen. Peanut Butter and Jelly. The font Papyrus and any beachfront enterprise. Some pairings are timeless and aren’t ever heading away. Equally, a stark, sans-serif font with some wonky lettering paying homage to the Parthenon’s inscriptions nearly Generally go with everything “Greek”. Greek dining establishments, Greek events, and in particular, Greek yogurt.

Chobani switched this up in 2017 as Greek yogurt started off to transfer into vogue. But this wasn’t just “GREEK” yogurt. It was Greek “YOGURT.” Yogurt is healthier and encourages gut well being, ideal? By including a heat and cozy green, plucky illustrations, and a chunky serif, Chobani productively refreshed a brand name that would go on to protect a variety of items.

THE Bad:


Gap rebrand before and after

Guaranteed to top rated just about every Worst Rebrand List is the Gap’s branding fail. Only a 7 days later on, the Hole reverted to their primary design and style, the iconic logo of 24 decades. Rarely has the internet reacted with so intense a maelstrom of fury than they did in 2010 when the chunky sans-serif blue mystery-sq. appeared for the first time. Julie Weiner of Vainness Fair described the new emblem as the “despised image of company banality,” in a 2010 short article. Soon after the furor, Hole changed back again to its authentic emblem, leaving absolutely everyone to speculate if it was a legit rebrand or a PR stunt. 



Sears rebrand before and after


CEO: “Here’s the deal. Our holdings flatlined in 2006 and commenced on a 10-year-cataclysmic nosedive in 2010. Does any one have any thoughts how to resolve this?”

VP OF BRANDING: “…We could insert a rocket ship icon up coming to our brand?”

CEO: “Approved.”



Tropicana rebrand before and after

The late 2000s had been a great time for rebranding. Social media was having off, which intended there have been new techniques, both organic and paid, to get your new brand name out there. However, the similar was genuine back then as it is right now — don’t modify just to modify.

Do not pivot just because you see other folks pivoting.

Whilst becoming “twitterpated” by the opportunities a new model could bring, Tropicana dropped a lot of the character and persona that folks experienced occur to value and appreciate. This was a thing that millions of people saw sitting on their kitchen area table each and every early morning. So a lot of men and women experimented with to jam a straw into an orange, allured by the promises on that carton – and now all of it was just… long gone. In Tropicana’s case, they learned Very immediately that they should not adjust.

As it turns out, there is something that rhymes with orange. It is “20% fall in product sales.” A mere two months immediately after the rebrand, PepsiCo switched again to the outdated packaging and advertisements.


Some brand names who did not really make the checklist, but are entitled to the lack-luster title of—



Volkswagen (2019)
Mailchimp (2018)


Animal Planet (2012)
New Coke (1985)


New Amsterdam -> New York

As you can see, there is a lot more to a very good visual identity than satisfies the eye! We hope you liked this enjoyment glimpse by some spectacular branding cases, which illuminate not only the success of aesthetics, but also the ability of community perception! 


Ready for anything funky-fresh?

Choose the future phase towards a distinctive model identity, backed by approach.